Tharon’s Thoughts : Rethinking Therapy for Autistic People

August 23, 2026




By Tharon

Neurodivergent Consultant at helpz



The Connection Between the Nervous System and the Brain 


Most people don’t realise just how closely the nervous system and the body are connected. This is true even for neurotypicals, but especially for neurodivergents where the gap between nervous system and body is a lot closer and vastly underestimated. What we think, feel, and experience is not just “in our heads”, it shows up physically, shaping our energy, our sleep, our digestion, and even how safe or unsafe we feel in the world. 


For many autistic people, the nervous system operates in a near constant state of alert - I call this battle mode. This is not because something is “wrong”, but because the environment often feels unpredictable, overwhelming, or demanding in ways that do not align with how our brains are wired. When you are repeatedly corrected, monitored, or told to suppress natural behaviours, the nervous system begins to interpret the world as a place of ongoing threat. Over time, this creates what can be described as a high neural load, meaning the brain is working harder simply to get through everyday experiences and therefore using more energy (Spoon Theory). 


Although autistic and neurotypical people have the same underlying regulation needs, the autistic individual is not able to access the regulation tools that come naturally to the neurotypical person. When typical strategies are unavailable, the nervous system turns to what is accessible. This is where stimming becomes not just important, but essential. 


Self stimming, short for self stimulatory behaviour, refers to repetitive movements or sounds that help regulate sensory input, emotions, and arousal levels within the nervous system. It can look like tapping a foot, clicking a pen, rocking, hand flapping, humming, or repeating sounds. Those are the common ones, but it can also look like hitting yourself in the head, hitting your head against a brick wall, or biting and scratching yourself until you bleed. While this is indeed an attempt at self-regulation, it is extreme and unhealthy. This is the nervous system at a desperate edge, an attempt to control the internal chaos and support regulation back to a controllable limit. It can also be more internal, such as silently repeating phrases in the mind, which is known as internal echolalia. While some stimming may appear unusual to others, it serves a very real purpose. It helps the nervous system find balance. 


Masking is the process of consciously or unconsciously suppressing these natural responses in order to meet social expectations. When someone masks, they often push their physical and sensory needs inward. As an example, I am often suppressing my visceral need to take my shirt off. This does not make the need disappear, it simply redirects it. The body still seeks regulation, and this can lead to less visible forms of stimming and/or an eventual build up that results in overwhelm. Over time, masking can also have physical effects, contributing to sleep difficulties, digestive changes, restraint collapse, increased heart rate, chronic tension and other mental or physical health repercussions. 


Anxiety in autistic people often looks different from what is typically recognised. Situations that may not seem stressful to others can be profoundly overwhelming due to sensory sensitivity, unpredictability, or social pressure. Being told to “tone it down” or to behave in a certain way can actually increase the anxiety, reinforcing the need to mask and further straining the nervous system. This is called Distinct Anxiety and is unique to autism. These patterns often begin early in life. Autistic individuals are born with these differences, but early on lack the internal awareness or communication skills to express their needs. When those needs go unmet, the body responds through distress signals such as intensified stimming or in extreme cases, meltdowns. 


Self regulation is the nervous system’s attempt to return to a state of balance. However, for someone experiencing constant sensory input, that balance can be difficult to achieve. Even in a quiet room, the brain is still processing layers of sound, movement, and sensation that others easily filter out. This ongoing input creates a sense of internal chaos, where the body struggles to find stillness and the mind never shuts up, even when we sleep. 


When the nervous system perceives ongoing threat, it moves into survival responses, commonly described as fight, flight, or freeze. The freeze response, often described in autistic experiences as shutdown, is when the system becomes overwhelmed and essentially powers down to protect itself. Another related experience is restraint collapse, where a person holds themselves together throughout the day and then, once in a safe environment, experiences an intense drop in energy and functionality. This can look like being unable to move, think clearly, or engage after getting home. 


Sleep can also be impacted. Many neurodivergent individuals describe not feeling rested, even after a full night in bed. The nervous system remains active when it should be settling, leading to restless sleep, muscle tension, or sudden jolts awake. These experiences are linked to the body remaining on alert, even when the environment is safe. 


The connection between the brain and the body is also deeply influenced by the gut. Around ninety to ninety five percent of serotonin, a chemical involved in mood, sleep, and emotional regulation, is produced in the digestive system. The gut contains trillions of microbes that communicate with the brain through what is known as the gut brain axis. These signals influence mood, stress responses, inflammation, and behaviour. Estimates vary widely across studies, but gastrointestinal symptoms are reported substantially more often in autistic individuals than in the general population, with many studies finding prevalence rates between about 40% and 70%.  While research is still emerging, there is growing interest in how gut health may relate to autistic experiences, particularly where gastrointestinal differences are present. 

 

Because regulation can be difficult to access, some individuals turn to external supports, including specific foods, caffeine, or other substances, in an attempt to manage attention, calm the mind, or lift mood. This reflects the nervous system seeking relief from ongoing intensity. It is not about poor choices, but about the drive to find quiet in a system that rarely rests. 


When regulation does occur, it can feel profound. It is often described as moving from chaos to calm, from a storm to stillness. This sense of quiet is not just preferred, it is necessary. Solitude can play an important role here. Being alone reduces sensory and social input, allowing the nervous system to settle. Even in the presence of loved ones, that need for space still exists without reflecting a lack of connection or care. 


Relationships can become complex within this context. People may unmask with those they trust, expressing more of their authentic selves.


However, this can sometimes be misunderstood, particularly if others are not familiar with neurodivergent communication and expression.


Misinterpretation can lead to disconnection, reinforcing feelings of being unseen, unheard and misunderstood. 


Many autistic individuals also carry a deep sense of grief linked to years of masking and not being fully accepted as they are. This can make authentic connection both deeply desired and difficult to maintain. In this context, animals often become powerful sources of comfort. Pets provide consistent, non judgemental companionship. Their presence can support regulation, offering rhythm, warmth, and predictability. Even something as simple as the sound and vibration of a cat purring has been associated with calming effects on the nervous system. 


The relationship between the nervous system and the body is complex and deeply interconnected. Understanding these experiences through a neuroaffirming lens shifts the narrative from one of deficit to one of difference. There is still much to explore, and as understanding grows, so too does the opportunity to support regulation, wellbeing, and authentic ways of being. 

Understanding what the nervous system may be communicating is an important step towards providing support that feels safe, respectful and genuinely neuroaffirming. If you or someone you support could benefit from guidance tailored to their individual needs,
get in touch with the helpz team to learn how we can help.


News & Insights

Check Our Latest Resources

September 22, 2026
When most people think about depression, they often picture someone who looks sad, withdrawn, or tearful. But what if depression doesn't look like sadness? What if it looks like irritability, aggression, refusing activities, changes in sleep, increased dependence on others, or a loss of interest in things that once brought joy? For people with intellectual disability, depression can look very different from what many of us expect. As a result, it is often misunderstood, misidentified, or missed altogether. People with intellectual disability experience the same range of emotions as everyone else. They experience happiness, excitement, disappointment, grief, loneliness, stress and sadness. Yet they are often less likely to have their emotional experiences recognised or discussed. Sometimes this is because communication may be more challenging. A person may struggle to describe how they are feeling, find it difficult to identify emotions, or lack the words to explain what is happening internally. Instead, their feelings may be expressed through changes in behaviour. A person who previously enjoyed social activities may start declining invitations. Someone who was once engaged and enthusiastic may appear tired, withdrawn, or uninterested. A person may become more anxious, frustrated, emotional, or reactive than usual. Others may experience changes in sleep, appetite, motivation or concentration. Because these signs can look different from traditional descriptions of depression, they are sometimes mistaken for "challenging behaviour," a personality change, or simply part of the person's disability. This misunderstanding can have significant consequences. People with intellectual disability are known to experience higher rates of mental health concerns than the general population. Yet they frequently face barriers to having these concerns recognised and appropriately addressed. Too often, emotional distress is attributed to the disability itself rather than considered as a possible mental health issue. This is sometimes referred to as diagnostic overshadowing - when changes in mood, behaviour or wellbeing are assumed to be part of a person's disability rather than signs that something else may be happening. The reality is that depression is not a normal part of having an intellectual disability. Just like anyone else, people with intellectual disability can experience periods of poor mental health, and they deserve access to understanding, support and appropriate care. One of the most important things families, support workers and professionals can do is notice change. Has the person stopped participating in activities they usually enjoy? Have they become more withdrawn? Are they sleeping more or less than usual? Do they seem less motivated, less energetic, or more emotional than usual? Often, those who know the person best are the first to recognise that something does not feel right. Meaningful support starts with listening, observing and being curious. Rather than focusing only on the behaviour we can see, it helps to consider what the person might be experiencing beneath the surface. It is also important to remember that mental health is about more than treatment. Factors such as meaningful relationships, community participation, physical health, choice and control, routine, purpose and belonging all contribute to emotional wellbeing. A good life is not simply the absence of illness. It is having opportunities to connect, contribute and engage in activities that bring meaning and enjoyment. This is why promoting mental health should be everyone's responsibility. Families, disability professionals, educators, healthcare providers and communities all play a role in creating environments where people feel valued, understood and supported. The more we recognise that people with intellectual disability experience the same emotional highs and lows as everyone else, the better equipped we are to notice when something has changed and provide support when it is needed. Because depression does not always look the way we expect.  Sometimes, the most important thing we can do is look beyond the behaviour and see the person.
September 22, 2026
Every generation inherits ideas about disability. Some are helpful. Many are not. While society has made significant progress in how we understand and support people with disability, there are still misconceptions that quietly shape the way people are treated, supported and included. Often these myths do not come from a place of malice. They come from outdated assumptions, limited exposure, or a desire to simplify something that is far more complex and human. Perhaps it is time we let some of them go. Myth 1: Independence Should Always Be the Goal Independence is often presented as the ultimate measure of success. But for many people, the goal is not independence. The goal is a good life. A good life might include support workers, assistive technology, family involvement, community participation and ongoing assistance with daily tasks. Requiring support is not a failure. It is simply part of being human. All of us rely on others in different ways throughout our lives. The question should not be, "How can we make this person independent?" Instead, we might ask, "How can we ensure this person has the right supports to live the life they want?" Myth 2: If They Can Do It Sometimes, They Can Do It All the Time One of the most common misunderstandings in the disability community is assuming that ability is consistent. A person may be able to attend a social event one day and struggle the next. They may communicate confidently in one setting but find it difficult in another. They may complete a task independently when rested, regulated and supported, but require assistance when stressed, overwhelmed or fatigued. Capacity can fluctuate. Disability is often dynamic, influenced by factors such as environment, health, sensory demands, stress levels, relationships and available supports. Judging someone based on what they can do on their best day can create unrealistic expectations and unnecessary pressure. Myth 3: Behaviour Is Just Attention-Seeking When someone is distressed, frustrated, overwhelmed or unable to communicate their needs effectively, their behaviour often tells a story. Yet behaviours of concern are still frequently dismissed as "attention-seeking." What if seeking attention is not the problem? Attention can mean connection. It can mean safety. It can mean a need for help, understanding or reassurance. Instead of asking, "How do we stop this behaviour?" we might ask, "What is this person trying to communicate, and what support do they need right now?" That small shift can completely change the support we provide. Myth 4: Communication Means Talking Some people communicate with speech. Others use devices, signs, gestures, pictures, behaviours, facial expressions or body language. Communication is not measured by how many words a person uses. Every person communicates. The responsibility is not only on the individual to communicate clearly. It is also on the people around them to listen, observe and create opportunities for communication in ways that work for them. When we broaden our understanding of communication, we broaden opportunities for connection, choice and self-determination. Myth 5: Disability Is Always Visible Many disabilities cannot be seen. Autism, ADHD, intellectual disability, psychosocial disability, chronic pain, acquired brain injury, neurological conditions and many health-related disabilities may have little or no obvious physical indicators. Because of this, people are often told they "don't look disabled." The reality is that disability is not defined by appearance. Someone's support needs, challenges and lived experiences remain valid whether those differences are visible or invisible. Myth 6: People With Disability Need to Be Fixed Perhaps the most harmful myth of all is the idea that disability is a problem that needs solving. Many people with disability are not looking to be fixed. What they want is understanding. Accessibility. Choice. Respect. Opportunity. Meaningful relationships. Communities where they belong. The barriers people face are often not created by their disability, but by environments, systems and attitudes that fail to accommodate human diversity. When we focus less on changing the person and more on changing the barriers around them, inclusion becomes possible. Let go of the myths Letting go of these myths does not mean ignoring challenges. Disability can involve genuine difficulties, support needs and barriers that require thoughtful responses. But when we replace assumptions with curiosity and judgment with understanding, we create space for something more important than awareness. We create acceptance.  And perhaps that is where meaningful inclusion truly begins.
September 22, 2026
Most people think of disability in terms of the challenges they can see. They might notice a mobility aid, a support worker, a therapy appointment or a visible difference in how someone communicates, learns or moves through the world. What they rarely see is the work happening in the background. The forms. The phone calls. The appointments. The waiting lists. The reports. The advocacy. The explaining. The repeating. The planning. The worrying. For many people with disability and their families, managing disability can feel like a full-time job. One that nobody applied for. One that has no annual leave. One that does not finish at the end of the day. Behind every support a person receives is often a long process of coordination and administration. Families may spend hours organising appointments, communicating with providers, navigating funding systems, responding to emails, attending meetings and ensuring supports are working as intended. A simple change in circumstances can generate a surprising amount of work. A new therapist. A school transition. A support worker leaving. A funding review. A change in health needs. Each can trigger a cascade of meetings, paperwork and decision-making. For many people, this work occurs alongside all the usual demands of everyday life. Parents are still parenting. People are still working. Families are still managing finances, relationships, household responsibilities and their own wellbeing. Yet hidden beneath it all is an additional layer of responsibility that often goes unrecognised. There is also the emotional labour. Advocating for support can be exhausting. Having to repeatedly explain a person's needs, justify access to services or provide evidence of challenges can take a significant toll over time. Many families become experts in systems they never expected to learn about. They develop knowledge of funding processes, legislation, assessments, therapies and service pathways simply because they have had to. Not because they chose to. Because someone needed to. What is remarkable is how often this work is done with extraordinary determination. Families continue showing up. Participants continue advocating for their goals. Support networks continue navigating complex systems because they know what is at stake. Opportunities. Safety. Independence. Quality of life. A future that reflects the person's hopes and aspirations. Recognising this hidden work matters. It reminds us to approach people with empathy. To understand that a delayed phone call or missed appointment may not be a sign that someone does not care. It may simply mean they are juggling far more than we can see. It reminds us that support is about more than providing a service. It is about reducing burden. Making systems easier to navigate. Helping people feel heard. Sharing responsibility where we can. Most importantly, it reminds us that behind every participant is a person living a life, not managing a case. A person with interests, dreams, relationships, strengths and ambitions. Because while disability may be part of someone's story, it should never become the entirety of it. The goal is not to spend a lifetime navigating systems. The goal is to spend a lifetime living.