Enhancing Accessibility for People with Visual Impairment: Bridging the Gap in Touchscreen Technology

October 11, 2023

In the today’s world, touchscreens have become an inseparable part of our lives. They offer convenience, interactivity, and functionality across various devices, from smartphones and tablets to ATMs and kiosks. However, as technology advances, it is crucial to consider the impact on different user groups, especially those with disabilities. One such group that faces significant challenges with touchscreens is people with visual impairments. The absence of tactile feedback and reliance on visual elements often leads to frustration and exclusion for those with visual impairment


In this blog, we will explore the problems faced by individuals with visual impairments while using touchscreens and look into some innovative technologies that aim to bridge this accessibility gap. It's essential to consider how what we often take for granted can lead to negative experiences for various minority groups.


Touchscreens and the Challenges for People with Visual Impairments


Touchscreens are not inherently designed with accessibility in mind. Unlike physical buttons or keyboards that offer tactile feedback and audio cues, touchscreens often lack these features. Icons, menus, and gestures, integral to the touchscreen experience, can be inaccessible for individuals relying on screen readers or magnifiers.


Research shows that touchscreens are becoming increasingly ubiquitous, but their design fails to consider the needs of those with visual impairments (Butler et al., 2008, p. 135). This creates barriers and makes it difficult for people with visual impairments to perform essential tasks or access critical information independently.


Promising Technologies for Improving Touchscreen Accessibility


Thankfully, researchers and developers are actively working on technologies to enhance touchscreen accessibility for people with visual impairments. Here are some exciting examples:

  1. Haptic Feedback: Haptic feedback involves using vibrations, forces, or motions to simulate the sense of touch. This technology can help individuals with visual impairments locate and identify elements on a touchscreen, such as buttons, sliders, or text fields. A research team from the University of Melbourne has created a prototype of a haptic touchscreen using electrostatic forces to create different textures and shapes on the screen surface (Butler et al., 2021, p. 1). Users can feel the contours and edges of elements with their fingers and receive audio cues during interactions. Testing with people with visual impairments revealed improved accuracy and efficiency in tasks like entering PINs or selecting options.
  2. Spatial Audio: Spatial audio relies on sound to create a three-dimensional representation of the environment, helping people with visual impairments orient themselves and navigate a given space. For instance, a team from the University of Sydney developed a system that guides individuals with visual impairments through indoor environments using touchscreens and spatial audio (Sato et al., 2021, p. 1). The smartphone app generates audio cues that indicate the direction and distance of Bluetooth beacons placed in the environment, providing crucial information about surroundings like doors, walls, and furniture.
  3. Tangible Interfaces: Tangible interfaces are physical objects that users can manipulate and sense to interact with digital information. These interfaces offer unique advantages in helping people with visual impairments access and control complex data, such as graphs, maps, or diagrams. An innovative system from the University of Queensland utilises tangible interfaces to aid visually impaired students in learning mathematics (Marriott et al., 2021, p. 1). The system consists of a tablet and tangible tokens representing numbers, operators, and variables. Placing the tokens on the tablet screen allows students to create and modify mathematical expressions, with audio feedback confirming their actions and reading out results.


Conclusion

 

The ever-present technology in our lives, particularly touchscreens, highlights the need for inclusivity and accessibility. While touchscreens have greatly enhanced the user experience for many, it is essential to acknowledge the challenges they pose for people with visual impairments. Developing technologies like haptic feedback, spatial audio, and tangible interfaces holds immense promise in improving touchscreen accessibility and a more inclusive environment for all users.


As we continue to embrace technological advancements, it is crucial to ensure that everyday conveniences do not exclude or frustrate groups of people. Being mindful of their needs is way for a more equitable and inclusive future.


References:

  • Butler M., Neave P., & Datta A. (2008). Object appreciation through haptic interaction: A case study in accessibility for museum exhibits. In Proceedings of ASCILITE 2008 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 135-144). Melbourne: ASCILITE.
  • Butler M., Datta A., & Neave P. (2021). Haptic Touch Screens: A Novel Approach to Accessible Touch Screen Interfaces for Blind Users Using Electrostatic Friction. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-13). New York: ACM.
  • Marriott K., Goncu C., Hurst J., & Jay T. (2021). Accessible Mathematics for Visually Impaired Students Using Tangible Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-14). New York: ACM.
  • Sato D., Cabrera D., & Ferguson S. (2021). Spatial Audio Guidance for Visually Impaired People Using Touch Screens. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-13). New York: ACM.


Dr. Matthew Butler: Object appreciation through haptic interaction - ASCILITE

Dr. Daisuke Sato: Spatial Audio and Acoustics research - The University of Sydney

Dr. Kim Marriott: Kimbal Marriott — Monash University

 


News & Insights

Check Our Latest Resources

September 22, 2026
When most people think about depression, they often picture someone who looks sad, withdrawn, or tearful. But what if depression doesn't look like sadness? What if it looks like irritability, aggression, refusing activities, changes in sleep, increased dependence on others, or a loss of interest in things that once brought joy? For people with intellectual disability, depression can look very different from what many of us expect. As a result, it is often misunderstood, misidentified, or missed altogether. People with intellectual disability experience the same range of emotions as everyone else. They experience happiness, excitement, disappointment, grief, loneliness, stress and sadness. Yet they are often less likely to have their emotional experiences recognised or discussed. Sometimes this is because communication may be more challenging. A person may struggle to describe how they are feeling, find it difficult to identify emotions, or lack the words to explain what is happening internally. Instead, their feelings may be expressed through changes in behaviour. A person who previously enjoyed social activities may start declining invitations. Someone who was once engaged and enthusiastic may appear tired, withdrawn, or uninterested. A person may become more anxious, frustrated, emotional, or reactive than usual. Others may experience changes in sleep, appetite, motivation or concentration. Because these signs can look different from traditional descriptions of depression, they are sometimes mistaken for "challenging behaviour," a personality change, or simply part of the person's disability. This misunderstanding can have significant consequences. People with intellectual disability are known to experience higher rates of mental health concerns than the general population. Yet they frequently face barriers to having these concerns recognised and appropriately addressed. Too often, emotional distress is attributed to the disability itself rather than considered as a possible mental health issue. This is sometimes referred to as diagnostic overshadowing - when changes in mood, behaviour or wellbeing are assumed to be part of a person's disability rather than signs that something else may be happening. The reality is that depression is not a normal part of having an intellectual disability. Just like anyone else, people with intellectual disability can experience periods of poor mental health, and they deserve access to understanding, support and appropriate care. One of the most important things families, support workers and professionals can do is notice change. Has the person stopped participating in activities they usually enjoy? Have they become more withdrawn? Are they sleeping more or less than usual? Do they seem less motivated, less energetic, or more emotional than usual? Often, those who know the person best are the first to recognise that something does not feel right. Meaningful support starts with listening, observing and being curious. Rather than focusing only on the behaviour we can see, it helps to consider what the person might be experiencing beneath the surface. It is also important to remember that mental health is about more than treatment. Factors such as meaningful relationships, community participation, physical health, choice and control, routine, purpose and belonging all contribute to emotional wellbeing. A good life is not simply the absence of illness. It is having opportunities to connect, contribute and engage in activities that bring meaning and enjoyment. This is why promoting mental health should be everyone's responsibility. Families, disability professionals, educators, healthcare providers and communities all play a role in creating environments where people feel valued, understood and supported. The more we recognise that people with intellectual disability experience the same emotional highs and lows as everyone else, the better equipped we are to notice when something has changed and provide support when it is needed. Because depression does not always look the way we expect.  Sometimes, the most important thing we can do is look beyond the behaviour and see the person.
September 22, 2026
Every generation inherits ideas about disability. Some are helpful. Many are not. While society has made significant progress in how we understand and support people with disability, there are still misconceptions that quietly shape the way people are treated, supported and included. Often these myths do not come from a place of malice. They come from outdated assumptions, limited exposure, or a desire to simplify something that is far more complex and human. Perhaps it is time we let some of them go. Myth 1: Independence Should Always Be the Goal Independence is often presented as the ultimate measure of success. But for many people, the goal is not independence. The goal is a good life. A good life might include support workers, assistive technology, family involvement, community participation and ongoing assistance with daily tasks. Requiring support is not a failure. It is simply part of being human. All of us rely on others in different ways throughout our lives. The question should not be, "How can we make this person independent?" Instead, we might ask, "How can we ensure this person has the right supports to live the life they want?" Myth 2: If They Can Do It Sometimes, They Can Do It All the Time One of the most common misunderstandings in the disability community is assuming that ability is consistent. A person may be able to attend a social event one day and struggle the next. They may communicate confidently in one setting but find it difficult in another. They may complete a task independently when rested, regulated and supported, but require assistance when stressed, overwhelmed or fatigued. Capacity can fluctuate. Disability is often dynamic, influenced by factors such as environment, health, sensory demands, stress levels, relationships and available supports. Judging someone based on what they can do on their best day can create unrealistic expectations and unnecessary pressure. Myth 3: Behaviour Is Just Attention-Seeking When someone is distressed, frustrated, overwhelmed or unable to communicate their needs effectively, their behaviour often tells a story. Yet behaviours of concern are still frequently dismissed as "attention-seeking." What if seeking attention is not the problem? Attention can mean connection. It can mean safety. It can mean a need for help, understanding or reassurance. Instead of asking, "How do we stop this behaviour?" we might ask, "What is this person trying to communicate, and what support do they need right now?" That small shift can completely change the support we provide. Myth 4: Communication Means Talking Some people communicate with speech. Others use devices, signs, gestures, pictures, behaviours, facial expressions or body language. Communication is not measured by how many words a person uses. Every person communicates. The responsibility is not only on the individual to communicate clearly. It is also on the people around them to listen, observe and create opportunities for communication in ways that work for them. When we broaden our understanding of communication, we broaden opportunities for connection, choice and self-determination. Myth 5: Disability Is Always Visible Many disabilities cannot be seen. Autism, ADHD, intellectual disability, psychosocial disability, chronic pain, acquired brain injury, neurological conditions and many health-related disabilities may have little or no obvious physical indicators. Because of this, people are often told they "don't look disabled." The reality is that disability is not defined by appearance. Someone's support needs, challenges and lived experiences remain valid whether those differences are visible or invisible. Myth 6: People With Disability Need to Be Fixed Perhaps the most harmful myth of all is the idea that disability is a problem that needs solving. Many people with disability are not looking to be fixed. What they want is understanding. Accessibility. Choice. Respect. Opportunity. Meaningful relationships. Communities where they belong. The barriers people face are often not created by their disability, but by environments, systems and attitudes that fail to accommodate human diversity. When we focus less on changing the person and more on changing the barriers around them, inclusion becomes possible. Let go of the myths Letting go of these myths does not mean ignoring challenges. Disability can involve genuine difficulties, support needs and barriers that require thoughtful responses. But when we replace assumptions with curiosity and judgment with understanding, we create space for something more important than awareness. We create acceptance.  And perhaps that is where meaningful inclusion truly begins.
September 22, 2026
Most people think of disability in terms of the challenges they can see. They might notice a mobility aid, a support worker, a therapy appointment or a visible difference in how someone communicates, learns or moves through the world. What they rarely see is the work happening in the background. The forms. The phone calls. The appointments. The waiting lists. The reports. The advocacy. The explaining. The repeating. The planning. The worrying. For many people with disability and their families, managing disability can feel like a full-time job. One that nobody applied for. One that has no annual leave. One that does not finish at the end of the day. Behind every support a person receives is often a long process of coordination and administration. Families may spend hours organising appointments, communicating with providers, navigating funding systems, responding to emails, attending meetings and ensuring supports are working as intended. A simple change in circumstances can generate a surprising amount of work. A new therapist. A school transition. A support worker leaving. A funding review. A change in health needs. Each can trigger a cascade of meetings, paperwork and decision-making. For many people, this work occurs alongside all the usual demands of everyday life. Parents are still parenting. People are still working. Families are still managing finances, relationships, household responsibilities and their own wellbeing. Yet hidden beneath it all is an additional layer of responsibility that often goes unrecognised. There is also the emotional labour. Advocating for support can be exhausting. Having to repeatedly explain a person's needs, justify access to services or provide evidence of challenges can take a significant toll over time. Many families become experts in systems they never expected to learn about. They develop knowledge of funding processes, legislation, assessments, therapies and service pathways simply because they have had to. Not because they chose to. Because someone needed to. What is remarkable is how often this work is done with extraordinary determination. Families continue showing up. Participants continue advocating for their goals. Support networks continue navigating complex systems because they know what is at stake. Opportunities. Safety. Independence. Quality of life. A future that reflects the person's hopes and aspirations. Recognising this hidden work matters. It reminds us to approach people with empathy. To understand that a delayed phone call or missed appointment may not be a sign that someone does not care. It may simply mean they are juggling far more than we can see. It reminds us that support is about more than providing a service. It is about reducing burden. Making systems easier to navigate. Helping people feel heard. Sharing responsibility where we can. Most importantly, it reminds us that behind every participant is a person living a life, not managing a case. A person with interests, dreams, relationships, strengths and ambitions. Because while disability may be part of someone's story, it should never become the entirety of it. The goal is not to spend a lifetime navigating systems. The goal is to spend a lifetime living.