Tharon’s Thoughts from Within: Understanding Sensory Processing in Autism: My Perspective

May 14, 2025




By Tharon

Neurodivergent Consultant at helpz



Today I am sharing my perspective on sensory processing. As an autistic person, I can see that there is a general effort in organisations and people trying to be more neuro- and sensory aware. However, the word ‘sensory’ is used so much, that I feel further attempts at education and awareness are needed, so that the impact of sensory processing isn’t lost in the buzz. Sensory processing is essentially the brain’s ability to interpret and respond to information from our environment. For me, and many others with autism, this process can be either heightened or diminished, leading to unique challenges.


I often have to ask people to repeat themselves multiple times, not because I didn't hear them, but because my brain repeatedly does not process some of the sounds into words. Sensory processing involves interpreting information from our surroundings, and for some of us with autism, this can mean processing too little or too much sensory input.


When someone is processing too much input, they are experiencing sensory overload. To describe this briefly, this occurs when my brain is overwhelmed by sensory input, which can lead to a meltdown. During an overload, my ability to manage the event and my response is limited, but possible. During a meltdown on the other hand, I have zero ability to control myself, including my reaction to perceived threats. An overload or a meltdown is your brain going into a pure survival mode, it shuts down everything except your instincts and survival responses to perceived threats. It takes time for your conscious mind to regain control. We don’t choose our sensory preferences or triggers, and many of us have difficulties explaining our sensory needs.


There are many attempts to understand our sensory preferences, and the use of a sensory profile assessment is one of them. However, when administering these assessments, it is important to know that the questions are often not precise enough for individuals with autism. They do not capture the full context of our experiences. For example, asking "Do you wear socks?" might get a straightforward "no", and the assessor may then assume there is no issue. However, if the assessor asked me “What is the process you put socks on?”, you may soon learn about the preference for tight or loose socks, for seamless socks, or low or high socks. There may also be conditions in which I can wear socks and conditions where I can’t. So yes, while I wear socks – it can be a painful experience for me, which you will only learn if you dig deeper or ask explicitly. Many of us lack the words to explain how we feel about sensory input and emotions, and our experiences can change depending on the context. Wording of questions needs to be considered to prevent inaccuracies and misunderstandings about our sensory needs.


One of the ways in which you may observe us regulating our sensory needs is through stimming. Stimming is a self-soothing action that helps with self-regulation. When asked to stop stimming, it can take immense strength and willpower, and it can be painful for us to stop stimming. It is important to let us explore sensory input preferences and help us to understand why we engage in certain behaviours. If a behaviour is inappropriate, help the person find a better way to meet their needs. However, if the behaviour is not inappropriate but just “different”, let it occur.


For example, if our stimming is annoying, we need to be told and given help to find less bothersome alternatives. Sensory tools can be incredibly valuable for self-soothing, and finding an effective one can be difficult but feel like striking gold when it is found. While there are many on the market, there is not a one-size fits all approach, and sometimes what works may be unconventional. It may be a person, music, an object, or even a martial arts kata. Having the right sensory tools can help us learn and function. A common strategy/tool in schools are movement breaks. However, these do not always need to be breaks. Children with autism may learn better when moving, and using movement as a tool supports their regulation in the classroom. This could take the form of flexible seating where they use swivel chairs, yoga balls, bean bags, and wobble cushions, where kids can move while they learn if they choose it. I write this focusing on children as there has been many advancements towards acceptance for children and supports for them, however there is a significant lack of supports for adults in the workplace and providing such accommodations.


Understanding and accepting sensory preferences and how this manifests in autistics is part of being neuroaffirming. I can acknowledge that some of the world is trying to be more neuroaffirming, and it is a step in the right direction that organisations are trying to be more sensory-friendly. However, it's not enough. The small windows we are given to do our shopping or to attend a venue is never going to suit every autistic person. We need to move towards a world where environments should be sensory-friendly more frequently and for longer periods, perhaps a weekly sensory day. We often have to adjust to what suits everyone else, but I look forward to the day when we no longer need to – a change I may never see in my lifetime; a change that can take generations.


I will leave you this month by correcting several misconceptions that I have noticed about sensory processing in autism:


  • “Sensory issues are exclusive to neurodivergent people”. They are not. Everyone can experience sensory processing difficulties. However, neurodivergent individuals often feel these more intensely due to a limited ability to regulate or filter out sensory input. You can feel overstimulated by sensory input without being neurodivergent.
  • “Stimming is only for neurodivergent people”. Everybody stims, the difference is that neurodivergent people do it with greater frequency and intensity, because their self-regulation needs happen more often.
  • “Sensory issues are just people being difficult”. It is not true. We do not choose our sensitivities, and while we work on building our tolerance or regulating ourselves (aka masking behaviour), it is not always possible. I have mentioned this before, and I will keep advocating this - we are not giving you a hard time; we are having a hard time.
  • "Sensory issues are just a phase.” This passing comment may seem harmless or hopeful to some, but it hurts us for you to assume that we choose this behaviour. Sensory processing issues are unlikely to disappear. We learn to regulate ourselves and build up tolerances (aka masking behaviour), but these are lifelong issues that can be managed but not eliminated.


The topic of sensory processing is huge, and difficult to summarise in a short opinion column. However, the continuation of learning and bringing awareness to these issues will create more understanding in society. At the end of the day, we want to create more inclusive and supportive environments for individuals with autism. This involves not only recognising the validity of sensory issues but also providing the necessary tools and strategies to help manage them effectively.


To learn more about meltdowns and other experiences of autistic people, register for Tharon’s upcoming training, just click the button.

Register here

News & Insights

Check Our Latest Resources

June 26, 2026
While the NDIS continues to evolve, our commitment to supporting people remains the same. 
June 12, 2026
Understanding the challenges, strengths, and support needs of people living with PWS Prader–Willi Syndrome (PWS) is a rare, complex genetic condition that affects many areas of a person’s life, including physical health, development, behaviour, and emotional wellbeing. While it’s often associated with eating and weight, PWS is much more than this, and understanding the whole picture is key to supporting individuals and their families well. PWS occurs when specific genes on chromosome 15 do not function as they should. This happens very early in development and is usually completely out of anyone’s control. It is not caused by anything a parent did or didn’t do, and in most cases it is not inherited. Although PWS is considered rare, families living with it are navigating its impacts every day. The condition is lifelong, and support needs often change as the person grows. Early signs and development Many children with PWS are identified in infancy. Babies often have very low muscle tone, which can make them appear “floppy.” Feeding can be difficult at first, with poor sucking and slow weight gain. Some babies may need extra feeding support during this stage. As children grow, the presentation of PWS changes. Muscle tone usually improves, but new challenges emerge. One of the most well‑known features of PWS is hyperphagia , a persistent and overwhelming sense of hunger that develops in early childhood. People with PWS do not experience fullness in the same way others do, which means food can become a constant focus without careful management. Alongside this, children may experience developmental delays, learning differences, short stature, and delayed puberty. Behavioural and emotional regulation can also be challenging, particularly during times of change, stress, or unmet expectations. Behavioural and emotional considerations People with PWS often thrive on routine, predictability, and clear boundaries. When these supports are in place, many individuals do very well. When they aren’t, anxiety, distress, or challenging behaviours can increase. Some common behavioural features include: Strong need for routine and consistency Difficulty coping with change or uncertainty Emotional outbursts linked to anxiety or frustration Repetitive or compulsive behaviours, such as skin picking These behaviours are not about “choice” or poor parenting. They are closely linked to how the brain processes information, stress, and impulse control in PWS. Health considerations Because of differences in metabolism, muscle mass, and hunger regulation, people with PWS are at higher risk of obesity and related health conditions if food access is not carefully managed. This can include diabetes, sleep apnoea, and cardiovascular issues. Hormonal differences are also common and may affect growth, bone health, puberty, and energy levels. Many individuals benefit from ongoing medical monitoring and treatment, including growth hormone therapy, which can support muscle tone, strength, and overall health. Support across the lifespan There is no cure for Prader–Willi Syndrome, but early, consistent, and coordinated support makes a significant difference . Support often includes: Clear structure around meals and food access Allied health supports such as speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physiotherapy Behaviour support that focuses on predictability, emotional regulation, and skill‑building Medical care from paediatricians, endocrinologists, and other specialists Strong collaboration with families, schools, and support workers As individuals move into adolescence and adulthood, planning for independence, supported living, employment, and community participation becomes especially important. Families and the invisible work Families supporting someone with PWS often carry a significant, ongoing load. Managing food environments, advocating for understanding in schools and services, navigating systems like the NDIS , and planning for the future requires constant attention and emotional energy. This work is often invisible to others, but it is essential. Families are experts in their child, and their knowledge and insight should always be valued and respected. Prader–Willi Syndrome and the NDIS In Australia, PWS is recognised as a lifelong condition under the NDIS . Many individuals require ongoing supports related to daily living, behaviour support, therapies, and community participation. Because PWS is rare and sometimes misunderstood, families may find themselves needing to explain the condition and its risks repeatedly. Strong, informed advocacy and clear documentation are often key to securing appropriate and responsive supports. Why awareness matters Greater awareness of Prader–Willi Syndrome helps reduce stigma, improves understanding, and leads to better outcomes. When professionals, communities, and systems understand that PWS is a complex neurological and genetic condition — not simply an issue of eating — support becomes more compassionate, effective, and sustainable. With the right structure, understanding, and support, people with PWS can live meaningful, connected lives, and families can feel less alone in the journey.
June 12, 2026
One thing we see time and time again in behaviour support is that the most effective plans aren’t created in isolation, they’re built together. That’s really what co-design is about. It’s not just a buzzword. It’s making sure the people who know the participant best are actively involved in understanding what’s going on and shaping what we do next. This becomes especially important during formulation. So, what’s a formulation session? A formulation session is where we slow things down and try to make sense of behaviour as a team. Rather than jumping straight into “how do we stop this?”, we take a step back and ask: What might this behaviour be communicating? When does it tend to happen? What seems to make things better or worse? It’s not about getting a perfect answer on the day. It’s about building a shared understanding that we can keep refining over time. Why co-design actually matters in practice Everyone comes into a formulation session with a different perspective. Families and carers often bring the history and the day-to-day reality Support workers see what happens in the moment Support Coordinators are looking at the bigger system and consistency Practitioners bring a framework to help organise it all If we don’t bring those views together, we end up with gaps or plans that look good on paper but don’t quite work in real life. When people are properly involved in the process, there’s usually better buy-in, more consistency, and less reliance on reactive strategies. What we’re trying to do in these sessions At its core, formulation is about understanding patterns. We might map things out simply: What’s happening before the behaviour? What does the behaviour actually look like? (clearly and without labels) What tends to happen afterwards? From there, we start looking at possible reasons—or functions—behind the behaviour. For example, is the person: trying to communicate something? overwhelmed or dysregulated? trying to get away from something? seeking connection or something preferred? There’s rarely just one answer, and that’s okay. What matters is that the team has a shared way of making sense of it. Making it useful, not just theoretical A good formulation should actually help guide what we do next. That’s where co-design really makes a difference. It keeps strategies grounded in reality: Will this work in the home or school environment? Is it something staff feel confident to try? Does it fit with the participant’s preferences and goals? If the answer is no, then we adjust it. That flexibility is part of the process. A few things that help sessions run well From experience, formulation sessions tend to be most useful when: People bring specific examples , not just general concerns There’s space for different viewpoints , even if they don’t fully align We focus on patterns over time , not one-off incidents The tone stays curious rather than critical Even small shifts in language can help, moving away from “non-compliance” and towards “what might be driving this?” Co-design takes a bit more time upfront, but it makes everything else easier. When a team has a shared understanding of behaviour, support becomes more consistent, more proactive, and more aligned with the person’s needs. And ultimately, that’s what we’re aiming for, support that actually makes sense in the person’s world, not just in a report. Have you attended a formulation session with your Behaviour Support Practitioner ? Book one now.